As PEP moves forward with trying to create partnerships within the district, specifically with the Community Relations Department, this writer felt it necessary to share her ideas/ideals on brokering effective partnerships.
According to an article written by Jack Pearpoint & Marsha Forest many parents, consumers, citizens feel that today’s partnerships mask the old ‘control’ games. Specifically, Pearpoint and Forest posit: “They feel that the “professionals” (those holding the power) really mean, come to our meeting, our service, our organization – an agree with our rules, our plan, our solution – whether you like it or not.” They conclude that “partnerships” often evoke suspicion and with this backdrop how can it be received any other way.
Here’s how! Let’s define partnerships – what does it mean, what would it look like, should a partnership be pursued? Partnerships as defined by The American Heritage College Dictionary, 3rd Edition – 3. The relationship of individuals or groups marked by mutual cooperation and responsibility. In addition to the mutual cooperation between individuals and groups there must also be inclusiveness and effective negotiations so that the end result is a partnership resulting in a win-win proposition.
As PEP continues to struggle for full recognition as a citywide PTO advocating for parents, students and the community for a better educational system – we will undoubtedly need to remain flexible yet steadfast as we attempt to create new dialogue for partnerships where people actually talk WITH each other. I’ll share this final thought by authors Pearpoint and Forest -- “ Diverse groups can reach common goals when they embrace partnership.”
Tomorrow – I’ll write more about - Inclusion – its place within a partnership.
Progress With Purpose!
12 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment